Re: bug in svn 17300

[David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>]

On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 10:55:34PM +0100, jah wrote:
> On 06/05/2010 22:38, David Fifield wrote:
> > Thanks, that confirms my suspicion. Changing the probe was probably
> > enough to avoid triggering whatever IDS rule was causing the bogus ICMP
> > response to be sent. Anyway, I've added EPROTO to the list of known
> > error code (that won't cause Nmap to abort) in r17488.
> >   
> I'm getting a compiler error because of EPROTO:
>
> ..\service_scan.cc(2271) : error C2065: 'EPROTO' : undeclared identifier
>
>
> I can't find a windows equivalent for EPROTO and from a quick google,
> there doesn't seem to be one defined for BSD variants either (for
> example [1] and [2]) so perhaps the EPROTO case in service_scan should
> be wrapped in an ifdef directive as in the attached patch.
>
> Sound OK?

Looks great, please do.

David Fifield
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/