Re: Safe and Intrusive Category confusion

[Ron <ron () skullsecurity net>]

On 09/22/2009 08:12 PM, David Fifield wrote:
> If this is the case, what do you think about deprecating intrusive and
> using "not safe" instead?
>
> I was trying to think of a reason not to have the safe XOR intrusive
> rule, but I couldn't think of any scripts that would be considered both
> safe and intrusive, or both not safe and not intrusive.
What about a scale. Some scripts are safe (known to not break anything), 
some scripts are intrusive (possible instability, DoS, etc), and some 
scripts are in between. Or is that too much?

Ron

--
Ron Bowes
http://www.skullsecurity.org/

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org