Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Safe and Intrusive Category confusion
From: Ron <ron () skullsecurity net>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 01:45:47 -0500
On 09/19/2009 01:41 AM, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
Also, I think we need to be more strict with category assignment (possibly construct a more thorough description and requirements document?) before acceptance into the trunk, just like NSEDoc. Some scripts have only one category when they could fit in several (and some are in the wrong categories, like ssh-hostkey.nse).
I agree. Honestly, when I actually remember to assign categories (as opposed to forgetting to change the the ones in the script I cp'ed), they're usually pretty random, and entirely based on gut feeling. I don't really have a strong understanding of why I should pick certain categories, I normally just look at similar scripts and copy theirs.
I definitely think more strictness and better description is required. Ron -- Ron Bowes http://www.skullsecurity.org/ _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Safe and Intrusive Category confusion Patrick Donnelly (Sep 18)
- Re: Safe and Intrusive Category confusion Ron (Sep 18)
- Re: Safe and Intrusive Category confusion David Fifield (Sep 22)
- Re: Safe and Intrusive Category confusion Ron (Sep 22)
- Re: Safe and Intrusive Category confusion Kris Katterjohn (Sep 22)
- Re: Safe and Intrusive Category confusion David Fifield (Sep 22)
- Re: Safe and Intrusive Category confusion Kris Katterjohn (Sep 22)
- Re: Safe and Intrusive Category confusion Fyodor (Sep 23)
- Re: Safe and Intrusive Category confusion David Fifield (Sep 27)
- Re: Safe and Intrusive Category confusion Patrick Donnelly (Sep 28)
- Re: Safe and Intrusive Category confusion Fyodor (Sep 28)
- Re: Safe and Intrusive Category confusion David Fifield (Sep 30)