Re: Status report #1 of 17

[venkat sanaka <venkatsanaka () gmail com>]

Thanks all for your replies.

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Corey Chandler <lists () sequestered net>wrote:

>

> Unfortunately I hit send before your second email came through-- it
> > explained the problem nicely.
>
> That is a nasty problem; I'd say that the /etc/hosts solution is probably
> the least painful solution, if (and only if) it works; I'd want to verify
> that it didn't behave unexpectedly; I'm pretty certain that all host
> resolution for externals occurs clientside, but I'd not stake my job on it.

   I will be trying out this method and let you know whether it worked out
without any unexpected behaviour.

> Would standing up a shell account  / *nix server for him for a month or two
> outside of his restrictive proxy server's jurisdiction be a viable option?

   I face this problem for next 2 weeks only, then i will be out of this
proxy server and will have a direct net connection
   during the coding period.Anyways i will not be that active for these 2
weeks because of my end semester exams.:)

> --
> Corey Chandler / KB1JWQ
> Living Legend / Systems Exorcist
> Today's Excuse: Webmasters kidnapped by evil cult
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
> Archived at http://SecLists.Org

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org