Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [NSE] A Lua implementation of NSE
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:03:42 -0800
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 05:19:44PM -0700, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
error). We don't necessarily have to look for deadlock because a script with a locked mutex will eventually timeout;
Minor clarification: I think this is only the case if the user specifies -T5 or --host-timeout. Most scans probably don't time out.
however, waiting until a target times out so a dead script ends is most certainly unacceptable.
Good point. Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Re: [NSE] A Lua implementation of NSE, (continued)
- Re: [NSE] A Lua implementation of NSE David Fifield (Jan 15)
- Re: [NSE] A Lua implementation of NSE--detailed review David Fifield (Jan 16)
- Re: [NSE] A Lua implementation of NSE--detailed review Patrick Donnelly (Jan 17)
- Re: [NSE] A Lua implementation of NSE--detailed review Patrick Donnelly (Jan 17)
- Re: [NSE] A Lua implementation of NSE--detailed review David Fifield (Jan 18)
- Re: [NSE] A Lua implementation of NSE--detailed review Patrick Donnelly (Jan 20)
- Re: [NSE] A Lua implementation of NSE--detailed review Patrick Donnelly (Jan 17)
- Re: [NSE] A Lua implementation of NSE Ron (Jan 17)
- Re: [NSE] A Lua implementation of NSE--chance for deadlock David Fifield (Jan 18)
- Re: [NSE] A Lua implementation of NSE--chance for deadlock Patrick Donnelly (Jan 20)
- Re: [NSE] A Lua implementation of NSE Patrick Donnelly (Jan 20)
- Re: [NSE] A Lua implementation of NSE Fyodor (Jan 20)
- Re: [NSE] A Lua implementation of NSE--chance for deadlock David Fifield (Jan 18)