Re: Updated SMB scripts

[jah <jah () zadkiel plus com>]

On 29/12/2008 21:03, Ron wrote:
> The processes is new, and I tasked my friend with re-writing the
> output bits. Can you give it a try with -vv, -v, and no verbose and
> tell me which you prefer? We were kind of experimenting.
Whoa!  I hadn't tried any of this with verbosity - it's like the gift
that keeps on giving.
I like the output from -vv best.  The -v style is interesting, but I
think the tree style output is less useful than that from -vv and it
looks terrible in xml output.  Having said that, xml ouput for script
results could definitely do with a makeover so that what appears on a
single line in normal output does so in xml.

I think that a -v output for processes might be similar to -vv:
|  nmap [2220]
|  | Parent: 1924 [cmd]
|  | Priority: 8, Thread Count: 2, Handle Count: 89

with less info:
|  nmap [2220] (parent: cmd)

and the comma delimited list of services for no verbosity as it is now.

Regards,

jah

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org