Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [NSE] MS08-067 check
From: Brandon Enright <bmenrigh () ucsd edu>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:32:45 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:51:30 -0600 Ron <ron () skullsecurity net> wrote:
I sent Brandon an email off the list, but, for anybody else interested, I implemented this this morning in svn://svn.insecure.org/nmap-exp/nmap-smb The issue is that you can't make multiple SMB connections to the same server from the same address. That's a limitation on the Windows side. Using mutexes (mutices?) gets around that.
...snip... Okay so this makes a huge speed difference. Scanning 196608 IPs went from 9006.34 seconds to 713.92 seconds. I'm not sure if it is an error or not but during the scan, I got quite a bit of this: SCRIPT ENGINE: .//nselib/smb.lua:206: Do not have a lock on this mutex Let me know if there is anything else I can help test. Brandon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkkbg70ACgkQqaGPzAsl94JggACfU8xPMNssVTIrjqeTJuCU8Rr0 5M0AoLLU6RyGF1gmvp2aIqOk/oh+ekpP =u4OK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- [NSE] MS08-067 check Ron (Nov 05)
- Re: [NSE] MS08-067 check jah (Nov 05)
- Re: [NSE] MS08-067 check Brandon Enright (Nov 05)
- Re: [NSE] MS08-067 check Ron (Nov 09)
- Re: [NSE] MS08-067 check Ron (Nov 09)
- Re: [NSE] MS08-067 check Brandon Enright (Nov 12)
- Re: [NSE] MS08-067 check Ron (Nov 12)
- Re: [NSE] MS08-067 check Ron (Nov 12)
- Re: [NSE] MS08-067 check Brandon Enright (Nov 12)
- Re: [NSE] MS08-067 check jah (Nov 05)
- Re: [NSE] MS08-067 check Ron (Nov 07)