Re: Adding "dangerous" checks?

[Ron <ron () skullsecurity net>]

Richard Sammet wrote:
> Hi Ron,
>
> how about using the check method/function from the metasploit exploit
> module for this "bug"?
>
> http://metasploit.com/svn/framework3/trunk/modules/exploits/windows/smb/ms08_067_netapi.rb
>
> the actual licens should be fine with nmap's - please correct me if i
> am wrong on this one.
>
> as of "Oct-10-2008 Metasploit 3.2 BSD Licensing (hdm)"
> (http://metasploit.com/blog/) everything should be fine....
>
> best regards,
> richard

That one's based on the Python one I'm looking at. Somewhere (I forget 
if it's in the exploit itself or in HD's post to the mailing list) he 
mentioned the same two issues -- possible Nessus heritage and crashing 
systems.

I'm more worried about crashing systems myself -- I don't think 
licensing applies to the traffic, if you aren't using their code. But 
IANAL, of course.

Ron

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org