Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [NSE] Yet another SMB version!
From: jah <jah () zadkiel plus com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:13:54 +0100
On 22/10/2008 00:20, Brandon Enright wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:10:25 +0100 jah <jah () zadkiel plus com> wrote:You might do something like the following within scripts: stdnse.print_debug( 2, ("%s %s some error happened with something"):format(id, ip) ) which might give youThe trouble is that the ip and port are locally scoped and the library doesn't have access. Maybe good library procedure would be to pass the ip, port in so that the debugging and error output has more information available to it.
Ah, yes. Silly me. And print_debug doesn't need to be passed a formatted string either. Silly me again. Perhaps though, there is a quick solution. coroutine.running() returns a thread. The currently running thread in fact - and you can print the thread id: print( coroutine.running() ) So what I'm thinking is that you could insert that statement right after: stdnse.print_debug(5, "MSRPC: Entering unicode_to_string(pos = %d, length = %d)", pos, length) in msrpc.lua and then in the action() of each script that you're running do: print( host.ip, coroutine.running() ) which should tie a thread id to a host IP and allow you to cross reference the thread id that failed. Other than that, as you say, passing the host.ip and script id to the library would work, but that would be a real pain in the arse as best-practise for library use. Regards, jah _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- [NSE] Yet another SMB version! Ron (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Yet another SMB version! Brandon Enright (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Yet another SMB version! Ron (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Yet another SMB version! Brandon Enright (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Yet another SMB version! Ron (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Yet another SMB version! jah (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Yet another SMB version! Brandon Enright (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Yet another SMB version! jah (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Yet another SMB version! Ron (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Yet another SMB version! bensonk (Oct 22)
- Re: [NSE] Yet another SMB version! Ron (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Yet another SMB version! Brandon Enright (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Yet another SMB version! Ron (Oct 21)