Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation
From: doug () hcsw org
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:31:13 -0700
On second thought, maybe moving the probe up isn't a good idea since it has a rarity of 5. This means that SIPOptions will be applied before GetRequest on unknown ports which probably is undesirable. I can think of two fixes: * Move SIPOptions back down and just let GetRequest be applied to 5060 before SIPOptions * Boost the rarity of SIPOptions Comments?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation doug (Jun 19)
- Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation doug (Jun 19)
- Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation Brandon Enright (Jun 19)
- Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation Fyodor (Jun 19)
- Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation Fyodor (Jun 19)
- Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation Matt Selsky (Jun 20)
- Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation doug (Jun 20)
- Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation sara fink (Jun 21)
- Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation Brandon Enright (Jun 19)
- Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation doug (Jun 19)