Nmap Development mailing list archives
-6 and -PE or -PN or -PP
From: jah <jah () zadkiel plus com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 02:42:12 +0100
Hi. Attached is null_device.patch - a draft patch to catch: nmap -6 -PE 2001::a08 Starting Nmap 4.62 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2008-05-12 02:14 GMT Standard Time Assertion failed: device != NULL, file ..\tcpip.cc, line 931 which also happens for -PN and -PP. regards, jah
--- NmapOps.cc.orig Mon May 5 10:43:45 2008 +++ NmapOps.cc Mon May 12 01:29:49 2008 @@ -374,6 +374,10 @@ if (pingscan && (TCPScan() || UDPScan() || ipprotscan || listscan)) { fatal("Ping scan is not valid with any other scan types (the other ones all include a ping scan"); + } + + if (af() == AF_INET6 && (PINGTYPE_ICMP_PING || PINGTYPE_ICMP_MASK || PINGTYPE_ICMP_TS)) { + fatal("ICMP Echo, Timestamp and Address Mask pings are only valid for IPv4."); } if (sendpref == PACKET_SEND_NOPREF) {
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- -6 and -PE or -PN or -PP jah (May 11)
- Re: -6 and -PE or -PN or -PP Fyodor (May 11)