Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 12:31:12 -0700
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 09:17:08PM +0200, mixter () gmail com wrote:
Done, nsock_telnet fixed. Should be a good testcase for fixing nsock's stdin/stdout handling. Compile nmap before and you can compile it with a 'make' from within nsock/examples now. Your approach looks great, Fyodor (transparently handling ENOTSOCK). Someone committing this eventually would be nice, to enable an official ncat merge, till then I'm working with a read() in my local version...
Great. How about if you either send a patch to the list, or you could make a branch of /nsock in /nmap-exp/mixter/nsock and then apply your changes there. Have you been able to test this on Windows yet? Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock mixter () gmail com (May 08)
- Re: ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock Fyodor (May 08)
- Re: ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock doug (May 08)
- Re: ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock mixter () gmail com (May 09)
- Re: ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock mixter () gmail com (May 09)
- Re: ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock Fyodor (May 09)
- Re: ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock mixter () gmail com (May 10)
- Re: ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock Fyodor (May 10)
- Re: ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock Fyodor (May 08)