Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock
From: " mixter () gmail com" <mixter () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 21:17:08 +0200
Done, nsock_telnet fixed. Should be a good testcase for fixing nsock's stdin/stdout handling. Compile nmap before and you can compile it with a 'make' from within nsock/examples now. Your approach looks great, Fyodor (transparently handling ENOTSOCK). Someone committing this eventually would be nice, to enable an official ncat merge, till then I'm working with a read() in my local version... ./nsock_telnet 127.0.0.1 22 The event id is 8 -- initiating l00p telnet_event_handler: Received callback of type CONNECT with status SUCCESS Successfully connected to 127.0.0.1:5632 -- start typing lines telnet_event_handler: Received callback of type READ with status SUCCESS SSH-2.x-noneofyourbusiness telnet_event_handler: Received callback of type READ with status ERROR READ failed: Socket operation on non-socket _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock mixter () gmail com (May 08)
- Re: ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock Fyodor (May 08)
- Re: ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock doug (May 08)
- Re: ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock mixter () gmail com (May 09)
- Re: ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock mixter () gmail com (May 09)
- Re: ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock Fyodor (May 09)
- Re: ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock mixter () gmail com (May 10)
- Re: ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock Fyodor (May 10)
- Re: ncat's nsock vs. nmap nsock Fyodor (May 08)