Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: STOMP Probe
From: Lionel Cons <lionel.cons () cern ch>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:55:40 +0100
doug () hcsw org writes:
Thanks for this probe. I checked it into SVN with one minor change: I put a rarity value of 8 instead of 7.
Thanks.
Maybe a good guideline should be that probes don't run in the default scan unless we expect them to match more than one application?
I would disagree with this. IMHO, it should be linked to the probability of finding the service during a scan. Popular services should be scanned by default, regardless of the fact that they may need a dedicated probe. Cheers, Lionel _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- STOMP Probe Lionel Cons (Jan 15)
- Re: STOMP Probe doug (Jan 17)
- Re: STOMP Probe Lionel Cons (Jan 17)
- Re: STOMP Probe doug (Jan 18)
- Re: STOMP Probe Lionel Cons (Jan 21)
- Re: STOMP Probe Lionel Cons (Jan 17)
- Re: STOMP Probe doug (Jan 17)