Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: STOMP Probe
From: doug () hcsw org
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:35:46 -0800
Hi Lionel, Thanks for this probe. I checked it into SVN with one minor change: I put a rarity value of 8 instead of 7. I'm not sure that it is worthwhile running this probe against all ports by default because it is very similar to the Help probe. Maybe a good guideline should be that probes don't run in the default scan unless we expect them to match more than one application? Thanks again, Doug On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:46:02PM +0100 or thereabouts, Lionel Cons wrote:
Here is a new probe to detect STOMP (http://stomp.codehaus.org/): ##############################NEXT PROBE############################## # ActiveMQ's STOMP (Streaming Text Orientated Messaging Protocol) Probe TCP HELP4STOMP q|HELP\n\n\0| rarity 7 ports 6163,61613 match stomp m|^ERROR\nmessage:Unknown STOMP action:.+ org\.apache\.activemq\.|s p/Apache ActiveMQ/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- STOMP Probe Lionel Cons (Jan 15)
- Re: STOMP Probe doug (Jan 17)
- Re: STOMP Probe Lionel Cons (Jan 17)
- Re: STOMP Probe doug (Jan 18)
- Re: STOMP Probe Lionel Cons (Jan 21)
- Re: STOMP Probe Lionel Cons (Jan 17)
- Re: STOMP Probe doug (Jan 17)