Nmap Development mailing list archives
RE: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels
From: "Thomas Buchanan" <TBuchanan () thecompassgrp net>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 11:57:43 -0600
-----Original Message----- From: nmap-dev-bounces () insecure org [mailto:nmap-dev-bounces () insecure org] On Behalf Of Lionel Cons Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 4:46 AM To: Kris Katterjohn Cc: nmap-dev () insecure org; Fyodor; Thomas Buchanan Subject: Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Kris Katterjohn writes: > What about something general like this: > > <linkedwith> > <library name="openssl" version="[version]" /> > <library name="libpcap" version="[version]" /> > <library name="libpcre" version="[version]" /> > <!-- etc --> > </linkedwith> Fine by me. Lionel
How does the attached patch (against SVN r6441) look? It prints the library versions for libpcap, libpcre, liblua (if included) and openssl (if included). Some questions that I had: 1. Where should the output go in the XML file? I put it right after the verbosity / debugging information. 2. What level of verbosity / debugging should be required to include this information? The patch reflects my opinion that it should be included at debugging >=1. 3. I make no guarantees that the patch to nmap.dtd is even remotely correct. I don't use the XML output on a regular basis, so that effort was just best-guess. 4. Should any other library versions be reported? I thought maybe libdnet, but I couldn't see a very clean way to do that. The library version is defined in (autogenerated) config.h and Makefile, and to be honest, I didn't feel like messing with it. I have tested the attached patch on Windows and Linux, and it seems to work for me. Thomas
Attachment:
nmap-library-versions.patch
Description: nmap-library-versions.patch
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Lionel Cons (Dec 04)
- Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Fyodor (Dec 04)
- Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Lionel Cons (Dec 04)
- Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels doug (Dec 04)
- RE: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Thomas Buchanan (Dec 06)
- Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Kris Katterjohn (Dec 06)
- Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Lionel Cons (Dec 07)
- RE: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Thomas Buchanan (Dec 07)
- Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Kris Katterjohn (Dec 07)
- Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Lionel Cons (Dec 04)
- Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Fyodor (Dec 04)