Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels
From: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:31:29 -0600
Thomas Buchanan wrote:
It should be part of the XML file too, of course.I'm not sure where something like this would fit in the Nmap XML schema, and I don't think it's worthwhile to insert it as a comment, as it's not parseable that way. If you have any ideas, I could extend the patch to support that.
What about something general like this: <linkedwith> <library name="openssl" version="[version]" /> <library name="libpcap" version="[version]" /> <library name="libpcre" version="[version]" /> <!-- etc --> </linkedwith> Thanks, Kris Katterjohn _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Lionel Cons (Dec 04)
- Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Fyodor (Dec 04)
- Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Lionel Cons (Dec 04)
- Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels doug (Dec 04)
- RE: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Thomas Buchanan (Dec 06)
- Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Kris Katterjohn (Dec 06)
- Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Lionel Cons (Dec 07)
- RE: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Thomas Buchanan (Dec 07)
- Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Kris Katterjohn (Dec 07)
- Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Lionel Cons (Dec 04)
- Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels Fyodor (Dec 04)