Re: Lua bugfixes and a new buffering feature

[Diman Todorov <diman.todorov () chello at>]

On 04.07.2007, at 23:32, Fyodor wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 11:01:51PM +0200, majek04 wrote:
> > On 7/4/07, Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org> wrote:
> > > > I'll take a look at it - maybe there is an easy way to replace
> > > > receive_lines with your buffer-approach, which seems more flexible
> > > anyway.
> > >
> > > That could be.  It might even be best to add the feature to nsock
> > > itself.  Or maybe you'll find it more convenient/performant to  
> > > add it
> > > at another layer.
> >
> > Well. Actually I proposed this approach some time ago:
> > http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2006/q4/0127.html
> >
> > My patch implemented nsock buffering in next layer, after nsock.
>
> Great!  I knew I had seen that somewhere before, but I wasn't able to
> find it.  The fact that two different people implemented this
> independently suggests that it is quite valuable.  So I hope that your
> implementation, or Doug's, or another one gets integrated.  Diman and
> Stoiko are currently guiding the NSE ship.

didn't we integrate that patch a long time ago? I will have to look  
into it. That's what I get for not updating the user docs :/


cheers,
Diman

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org