Re: Lua bugfixes and a new buffering feature

[Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>]

On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 11:01:51PM +0200, majek04 wrote:
> On 7/4/07, Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org> wrote:
> > > I'll take a look at it - maybe there is an easy way to replace
> > > receive_lines with your buffer-approach, which seems more flexible 
> > anyway.
> >
> > That could be.  It might even be best to add the feature to nsock
> > itself.  Or maybe you'll find it more convenient/performant to add it
> > at another layer.
>
> Well. Actually I proposed this approach some time ago:
> http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2006/q4/0127.html
>
> My patch implemented nsock buffering in next layer, after nsock.

Great!  I knew I had seen that somewhere before, but I wasn't able to
find it.  The fact that two different people implemented this
independently suggests that it is quite valuable.  So I hope that your
implementation, or Doug's, or another one gets integrated.  Diman and
Stoiko are currently guiding the NSE ship.

Cheers,
-F

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org