Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format
From: William McVey <wam () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:53:22 -0500
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 12:29 -0300, Livio Zanol Puppim wrote:
Yeah, I know It's against RFC, but a lot of things are against it either... Like "every host should reply an echo request with an echo reply" and many many other things...
Actually, RFC 2979 (sect 3.1.1) clearly states that it's acceptable for firewalls to block ICMP Echo and Echo Reply messages.
Some companys likes to use this kind of mask to "masquerade" their networks...
Those companies are going to have a devil of a time doing route aggregation using any modern routing protocol. Seriously, if companies are really doing this then they are just asking for trouble (DoS by clueless network administration).
I've never tried the method you've menthioned, i'll give this a try...
You can also use wildcards for octects. So for example: nmap -sL -n 'A.*.C.D' -- William _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Livio Zanol Puppim (Oct 18)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Martin Mačok (Oct 18)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Livio Zanol Puppim (Oct 19)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format William McVey (Oct 19)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (Oct 19)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Livio Zanol Puppim (Oct 19)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Livio Zanol Puppim (Oct 19)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Martin Mačok (Oct 18)