Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format
From: Martin Mačok <martin.macok () underground cz>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:16:28 +0200
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:02:05PM -0200, Livio Zanol Puppim wrote:
I'm asking this cause I have already seen crazies subnet masks used (like 255.0.255.255).
This is against RFC, anyway. Netmask should be continuous and expressible in /X notation where X is (0,32).
So with that kind of subnet masks I can't make a complete subnet scan with the normal format...
Have you tried scanning A.0-255.C.D ? Martin Mačok ICT Security Consultant _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Livio Zanol Puppim (Oct 18)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Martin Mačok (Oct 18)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Livio Zanol Puppim (Oct 19)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format William McVey (Oct 19)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (Oct 19)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Livio Zanol Puppim (Oct 19)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Livio Zanol Puppim (Oct 19)
- Re: Subnet masks in Dotted-Decimal format Martin Mačok (Oct 18)