Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Scanning Printers
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:13:46 -0700
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:29:45PM -0700, doug () hcsw org wrote:
As you realise, the entire practice of skipping version detection on certain ports opens up a small hole. Hiding daemons on these ports potentially becomes somewhat easier - except obviously not against intelligent users like yourself who understand this. :) I don't know of any other common uses for these ports and see no reason to not add them to the default Exclude directive.
I agree with Doug and have extended the Exclude range for the next version to cover 9100-9107. I have also updated nmap-services to scan those ports by default. Thanks for noting the issue, Hari. Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Scanning Printers Hari Sekhon (Sep 26)
- Re: Scanning Printers Fyodor (Sep 26)
- Re: Scanning Printers Hari Sekhon (Sep 26)
- Re: Scanning Printers doug (Sep 26)
- Re: Scanning Printers Hari Sekhon (Sep 27)
- Re: Scanning Printers Fyodor (Sep 28)
- Re: Scanning Printers Hari Sekhon (Sep 26)
- Re: Scanning Printers Fyodor (Sep 26)