Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: --scan_delay weirdness (Increasing send delay from 3000 to 1000)
From: Martin Mačok <martin.macok () underground cz>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:41:17 +0200
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 05:14:34PM -0700, Fyodor wrote:
Note the last line - it is _increasing_ from 3000 to 1000, which is probably wrong.Thanks for the report. I have put in a fix for the next version of Nmap. Do you know why so many packets were being dropped, even with Nmap sending just one probe every 3 secodns?
I'm not sure (zero-knowledge penetration test), but from the outside it looks like there is a very low rate-limit on SYN packets (which is silly since the limit is not per IP). Martin Mačok IT Security Consultant --------------------------------------------------------------------- For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List archive: http://seclists.org
Current thread:
- --scan_delay weirdness (Increasing send delay from 3000 to 1000) Martin Mačok (Sep 23)
- Re: --scan_delay weirdness (Increasing send delay from 3000 to 1000) Fyodor (Sep 27)
- Re: --scan_delay weirdness (Increasing send delay from 3000 to 1000) Martin Mačok (Sep 29)
- Re: --scan_delay weirdness (Increasing send delay from 3000 to 1000) Fyodor (Sep 27)