nanog mailing list archives
Re: Alien Waves
From: Dave Cohen <craetdave () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 14:35:42 -0400
It’s one of those things that makes a lot more sense on paper than in practice. I’ve found it to be operationally difficult from the perspective the provider and the user, primarily but not solely because any “co-managed” system is going to lend itself to finger pointing when issues arise. Even if it makes more commercial sense at first blush to prefer a spectrum solution over dark or traditional waves, I suspect that factoring in “labor cost wasted over unproductive troubleshooting” changes the equation a bit. I also suspect that continued price compression on optical hardware will lead to fewer and fewer situations where it might make commercial sense at first blush too. YMMV of course and there may be reasons beyond simple commercial models where spectrum might make sense for you, but I’d urge you to only consider it doing with a provider where you’ve had a track record of operational success working with them. Dave Cohen craetdave () gmail com
On May 12, 2024, at 2:17 PM, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote: What are your experiences with alien waves, managed spectrum, spectrum as a service, etc? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com
Current thread:
- Alien Waves Mike Hammett (May 12)
- Re: Alien Waves Dave Cohen (May 12)
- Re: Alien Waves Mark Tinka (May 12)
- Re: Alien Waves Dave Cohen (May 12)
- Re: Alien Waves Mark Tinka (May 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Alien Waves Mike Hammett (May 12)
- Re: Alien Waves Dave Cohen (May 12)
- Re: Alien Waves Brandon Martin (May 12)
- Re: Alien Waves Mark Tinka (May 12)
- Re: Alien Waves Mark Tinka (May 12)
- Re: Alien Waves Dave Cohen (May 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Alien Waves Dave Cohen (May 12)
- Re: Alien Waves Mark Tinka (May 12)