nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mailing list SPF Failure
From: Karl Auer <kauer () biplane com au>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 12:45:34 +1000
On Thu, 2024-05-16 at 19:27 -0700, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 5/16/24 7:22 PM, Scott Q. wrote:Mike, you do realize Google/Gmail rejects e-mails with invalid/missing SPF right ?I was receiving the mail while NANOG had no SPF record, so no? Any receiver would be really stupid take a single signal as disqualifying.
For small-scale senders, it's either or both. For large-scale senders (5000+ per day) it's both. At least according to this: https://support.google.com/a/answer/81126 Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer (kauer () biplane com au, he/him) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer
Current thread:
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure, (continued)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure William Herrin (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure John R. Levine (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure John R. Levine (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Tom Beecher (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Tom Beecher (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Karl Auer (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Hank Nussbacher (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Karl Auer (May 17)