Re: Mailing list SPF Failure

[Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc>]

> I'm surprised nobody noticed for close to 10 days.


Probably because it wasn't 10 days.

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:26 PM Scott Q. <qmail () top-consulting net> wrote:

> I'm surprised nobody noticed for close to 10 days. I was away from work
> and upon coming back I saw the little discussion there was , in my Spam
> folder.
>
> On Thursday, 16/05/2024 at 18:56 John R. Levine wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2024, William Herrin wrote:
> > The message content (including the message headers) is theoretically
> > not used for SPF validation. In practice, some SPF validators don't
> > have direct access to the SMTP session so they rely on the SMTP
> > session placing the envelope sender in the Return-path header.
>
> But that wasn't the problem here, the SPF record was just gone.  Oops.
>
> I see that the SPF record is back and seems have the correct addresses so
> we can now return to our previously scheduled flamage.
>
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl () taugh com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
> Dummies",
> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly