nanog mailing list archives
Re: Networks ignoring prepends?
From: Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 07:26:22 -0800
When you twist a policy knob to move BGP off its defaults, you take responsibility for making a better routing choice. And for correcting that choice if it should prove faulty. What I've seen here in this thread is a bunch of folks abdicating that responsibility. That's not unexpected, but it is disappointing.
Better is in the eye of the beholder. From your perspective, better is the lowest latency. From almost any ISPs perspective, better is the revenue positive path, followed by the revenue neutral path, with last choice being the revenue negative path. From 3356 perspective, they ARE choosing the best routeā¦ the route that pays them. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends?, (continued)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Chris Adams (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Robert Raszuk (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? James Jun (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Chris Adams (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Chris Adams (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Majdi S. Abbas (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Tom Beecher (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? James Jun (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Niels Bakker (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Forrest Christian (List Account) (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Alex Le Heux (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jan 22)