nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 08:50:39 +0200
On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 06:18, Forrest Christian (List Account) < lists () packetflux com> wrote: If 50٪ of the servers and 50% of the clients can do IPv6, the amount of
IPv6 traffic will be around 25% since both ends have to do IPv6.
This assumes cosmological principle applies to the Internet, but Internet traffic is not uniformly distributed. It is entirely possible, and even reasonable, that AMSIX ~5% and GOOG 40% are bps shares, and both are correct. Because AMSIX sees large entropy between A-B end-points, GOOG sees very low entropy, it being always the B. Certain tier1 transit network could see traffic being >50% IPv6 between two specific pops, so great IPv6 adoption? Except it was a single CDN sending traffic from them to them, if you'd exclude that CDN flows between the pop, the IPv6 traffic share was low single digit percentage. I am not saying IPv6 traffic is not increasing, I am saying that we are not doing any favours to anyone, pretending we are on-track and that this will happen, and that there are organic drivers which will ensure we are going to end up with IPV6-only Internet. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: Burn Rate? Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block, (continued)
- Re: Burn Rate? Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Niels Bakker (Jan 13)
- Re: Burn Rate? Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Tom Beecher (Jan 12)
- Reusable 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Abraham Y. Chen (Jan 11)
- Re: Reusable 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Christopher Hawker (Jan 11)
- Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Abraham Y. Chen (Jan 11)
- Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Ryan Hamel (Jan 11)
- IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Abraham Y. Chen (Jan 12)
- Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Ryan Hamel (Jan 12)
- IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Abraham Y. Chen (Jan 14)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Forrest Christian (List Account) (Jan 14)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Saku Ytti (Jan 14)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block jordi.palet--- via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Saku Ytti (Jan 15)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block jordi.palet--- via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Saku Ytti (Jan 15)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Christopher Hawker (Jan 15)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Michael Thomas (Jan 15)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Michael Thomas (Jan 15)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Saku Ytti (Jan 15)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Michael Thomas (Jan 16)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jan 16)