nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 90 Attendance?
From: Warren Kumari <warren () kumari net>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 11:50:17 -0800
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 8:31 AM, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:
I haven't been to a NANOG meeting in a while. While going through the attendee list for NANOG 90 to try to book meetings with people, I noticed a lack of (or extremely minimal) attendance by several organizations that have traditionally had several employees attend. I've also noticed that some organizations I had an interest in were only sending sales people, not technical people.
There have been a few changes - part of this is driven by post-pandemic decreased travel budget in many organizations, part by industry changes and consolidation, but also a fair bit seems to be because the tone of NANOG has changed and become much more of a polished, sales-y feeling event than it used to be…. Here is the current NANOG agenda: https://www.nanog.org/events/nanog-90/agenda/ Here is the agenda from 20 years ago: https://www.nanog.org/events/nanog-30/nanog-30-agenda-2/ This time I've received at least 6 phone calls along this line of "Hi, I'm [person] from [company]. We are a NANOG sponsor and we'd like to personally invite you to a very special [breakfast/lunch/dinner] with our [CEO/CTO]. They'd love to explain how we can solve your [security/inventory/DDoS/automation/documentation] needs…" There would alway be business stuff done at NANOG, but it used to be more along the lines of "Hey, we have too much traffic in [location]. I saw you have a cage in [location] too… If I hand you an Ethernet, can we peer there? Great…" or "So, I have a Foozle-1205 with the Turbo-forwarding(R) option, but when I configure hyperspace-bypass mode, fire comes out…. I know you also use Turbo-forwarding(R), but it looks like you still have your eyebrows. Any hints? Oh… cool, I didn't know that you could use wormholes to avoid the hyperspace issue. Ta." W How long has this been a thing?
I remember when I attended years ago that there simply wasn't enough time to meet with technical people from all of the organizations I wanted to meet with. Now the calendar is looking a bit dry. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com
Current thread:
- NANOG 90 Attendance? Mike Hammett (Feb 11)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Ryan Hamel (Feb 11)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Tom Beecher (Feb 11)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Mike Hammett (Feb 11)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Glen A. Pearce (Feb 13)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Tom Beecher (Feb 13)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Glen A. Pearce (Feb 13)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Mike Hammett (Feb 14)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Paul Ebersman (Feb 14)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Tom Beecher (Feb 14)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Tom Beecher (Feb 11)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Ryan Hamel (Feb 11)
- RE: NANOG 90 Attendance? Howard, Lee via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Tom Beecher (Feb 15)
- RE: NANOG 90 Attendance? Howard, Lee via NANOG (Feb 15)
- RE: NANOG 90 Attendance? Warren Kumari (Feb 19)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Randy Bush (Feb 19)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Warren Kumari (Feb 20)