nanog mailing list archives

Re: NANOG 90 Attendance?


From: Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 08:56:28 -0500

Yup. Post pandemic, the unfortunate hotel situation, and a non-zero number
of companies still have tight travel budgets.

It's been slowly creeping back though.

On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 8:44 AM Ryan Hamel <ryan () rkhtech org> wrote:

Mike,

The numbers have not bounced back to pre-pandemic levels, and it doesn't
help that NANOG 90 has had some hotel issues.

Ryan

------------------------------
*From:* NANOG <nanog-bounces+ryan=rkhtech.org () nanog org> on behalf of
Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
*Sent:* Sunday, February 11, 2024 5:31:02 AM
*To:* nanog <nanog () nanog org>
*Subject:* NANOG 90 Attendance?

Caution: This is an external email and may be malicious. Please take care
when clicking links or opening attachments.

I haven't been to a NANOG meeting in a while. While going through the
attendee list for NANOG 90 to try to book meetings with people, I noticed a
lack of (or extremely minimal) attendance by several organizations that
have traditionally had several employees attend. I've also noticed that
some organizations I had an interest in were only sending sales people, not
technical people.

How long has this been a thing? I remember when I attended years ago that
there simply wasn't enough time to meet with technical people from all of
the organizations I wanted to meet with. Now the calendar is looking a bit
dry.



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com



Current thread: