Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?

[Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

/32s are perfectly valid in the DMS, but there is currently an IETF limit of ~500M of them (the other 3.5B are not yet 
released to the RIRs, only 2000::/3).

Owen


> On Sep 29, 2023, at 12:54, Collider <large.hadron.collider () gmx com> wrote:
>
> This thread is utter amateur hour. I too would rather /32s be valid in the DFZ - but they're not, for good reason 
> (worstcase scenario = circa 4 bln. routing table entries - no BGP hwaccel can swing that!).
>
>
> Le 29 septembre 2023 19:51:29 UTC, Seth Mattinen via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> a écrit :
> > On 9/29/23 10:24, VOLKAN SALİH wrote:
> > > you guys become rich this way.. by playing penny pincher.
> > >
> > > I asked global firms like Huawei, not some local company called ADAMS!
> >
> >
> > You joined the wrong mailing list then. This is NANOG, which has companies of all sizes and private individuals 
> > operating networks. This is not a "global firms" mailing list.
>
> -- 
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.