nanog mailing list archives
Re: Routed optical networks
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 16:24:12 +0200
On 5/11/23 13:25, Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG wrote:
Sandvine is not representative of global traffic because DPI is installed mostly for Mobiles. But Mobile subscriber is 10x less than fixed on traffic – it is not the biggest source. Moreover, Mobiles would look better growing because the limiting factor was on technology (5G proposed more than 4G, 4G proposed much more than 3G) – it would probably would less disruptive in the future.Fixed Carriers do not pay DPI premiums. And rarely share their traffic publicly. Sandvine could not see it.
And QUIC is making the the DPI model so loved by MNO's quickly irrelevant. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Routed optical networks, (continued)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 11)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 11)
- Re: Routed optical networks Jared Mauch (May 11)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 11)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 11)
- RE: Routed optical networks Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (May 11)
- Re: Routed optical networks Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (May 11)
- RE: Routed optical networks Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (May 11)
- Re: Routed optical networks Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (May 11)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 11)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 11)
- Re: Routed optical networks Dave Taht (May 12)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 12)
- LibreQos Dave Taht (May 12)
- Re: LibreQos Mark Tinka (May 13)
- Re: LibreQos Dave Taht (May 13)
- Re: Routed optical networks Dave Taht (May 12)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 11)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mike Hammett (May 12)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 13)
- Re: Routed optical networks joel (May 15)