nanog mailing list archives
Re: Are we back to the 2000's again?
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2023 16:35:37 -0700
On 6/3/23 4:24 PM, William Herrin wrote:
Oh yeah. This oh-so-two decades ago. I can't believe this sort of thing is still going on. What a pointless waste of money.On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 4:09 PM Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com> wrote:How can the RIAA even know? I mean, are they putting up honey pots or something?IIRC, they went after folks sharing the files via bit torrent rather than folks who only downloaded them.
Mike
Current thread:
- Are we back to the 2000's again? Michael Thomas (Jun 03)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? Mel Beckman (Jun 03)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? William Herrin (Jun 03)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? Michael Thomas (Jun 03)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? William Herrin (Jun 03)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? Michael Thomas (Jun 03)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? William Herrin (Jun 03)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? Mel Beckman (Jun 03)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? Mel Beckman (Jun 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? Terrence de Kat (Jun 03)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? Mel Beckman (Jun 03)
- RE: Are we back to the 2000's again? Brian Turnbow via NANOG (Jun 05)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? Terrence de Kat (Jun 03)