nanog mailing list archives
Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP?
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 11:29:10 -0800
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 11:24 AM William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
QUIC is better, but it still leaves finding the server's new IP address as an exercise for a process outside of the protocol.
Gah, brain spat out the wrong info. Bad brain. QUIC doesn't allow the server to change its IP address; only the client can change. So it doesn't really help the multihoming situation. Regards, Bill Herrin -- For hire. https://bill.herrin.us/resume/
Current thread:
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP?, (continued)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Masataka Ohta (Jan 24)
- RE: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Chris J. Ruschmann (Jan 24)
- RE: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Robert McKay (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? John Levine (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Forrest Christian (List Account) (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Lars Prehn (Jan 25)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Masataka Ohta (Jan 27)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? William Herrin (Jan 28)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Donald Eastlake (Jan 28)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? William Herrin (Jan 28)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? William Herrin (Jan 28)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Masataka Ohta (Jan 28)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? William Herrin (Jan 28)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Masataka Ohta (Jan 28)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? William Herrin (Jan 29)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Masataka Ohta (Jan 28)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Masataka Ohta (Jan 29)
- ROV concern for hyper-specific prefixes (renamed from `Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP?') Amir Herzberg (Jan 30)
- Re: ROV concern for hyper-specific prefixes (renamed from `Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP?') Tom Beecher (Jan 30)
- Re: ROV concern for hyper-specific prefixes (renamed from `Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP?') Amir Herzberg (Jan 30)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Eric Kuhnke (Jan 25)