nanog mailing list archives
Re: About emails impersonating Path Network
From: "J. Hellenthal via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 11:27:36 -0600
Have a feeling this will result in a privacy policy thats implemented in customer controlled switch's which is against having a central directory for free lookup's. And feel ambiguous to the current policy in place. Yeah you can certainly identify abusers that are performing queries that go beyond normal expectations but can you identify those that are a little pretentious and trying to protect a single org ? Id be willing to come onboard to assist but I fear in this area I may be limited to impact. I feel its worth my time simply for the cause it causes too many ppl considerable time to react to financially and company posture. Best Regards This is not a advertisement or for personal benefit. (DISCLAIMER). This is a hobby.
On Feb 7, 2023, at 11:15, Martin Hannigan <hannigan () gmail com> wrote: On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 11:59 AM J. Hellenthal via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote: Your only option is to monitor the generic tld's atp and register them yourself. Clone attacks are real, impersonation has been around since centuries and yes, its an attack vector but only impacting your customers. There is a vector you can pursue, its action by lawsuit. Would you rather pay the registration of the domain or would you rather pay the retainer costs of lawyers ... This is what the free web permits. Your only choice at this point is the retainer fee and intergovernmental practices. PeeringDB may be able to implement different practices but I have a pretty good feeling they are at their wits end to void practices that impact its "yellow pages" service. [ PDB product committee hat on ] I'll make sure this gets visibility with the PeeringDB product/ops committee and see if we can contribute here. If we can help make it harder I'm sure we would. Warm regards, -M<
-- J. Hellenthal The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume.
Current thread:
- About emails impersonating Path Network Konrad Zemek (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Martin Hannigan (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Michael Thomas (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Rich Kulawiec (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Michael Thomas (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Jay Hennigan (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Michael Thomas (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Rich Kulawiec (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Martin Hannigan (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Feb 08)