nanog mailing list archives
Re: About emails impersonating Path Network
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 20:54:39 -0500
Is widespread impact confirmed? Unfortunate. Our ASN’s and location contacts in PDB have not received anything from Path. I looked in search engines (quickly) and see nothing negative re: your ASN. I found a reference as new to the platform at AMSIX 7/21 for AS 396998. Lack of mail security bits on most platforms are flagged or quarantined AFAIK. These are typically called “Joe Jobs”. I’d save the LEA path for more important things (credibility). Warm regards, -M< On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 3:39 PM Konrad Zemek <konrad () zemek io> wrote:
Hi Nanog, It looks like someone with an axe to grind against our company has decided to email every AS contact they could find on PeeringDB, impersonating us and sometimes spoofing our domains. We're aware of the emails and are sorry for the inconvenience. We've since added SPF records to the domains we own but don't use (the perps have since name-squatted some new ones). We're also actively working with law enforcement on the matter. Thanks Konrad Zemek CTO Path Network AS396998
Current thread:
- About emails impersonating Path Network Konrad Zemek (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Martin Hannigan (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Michael Thomas (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Rich Kulawiec (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Michael Thomas (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Jay Hennigan (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Michael Thomas (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Rich Kulawiec (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Martin Hannigan (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Feb 08)