nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...?
From: Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 17:08:38 -0400
It should be a huge embarrasment to the designers. They survive on low price and unique features. It would be quite amazing to have a CLI without the nonsense.
That ship sailed years ago. Even though the legal precedent was set after Cisco vs Arista that CLI elements that are of common , standard usage aren't copyrightable, nobody wants to take the risk. So they come up with other ways that tend to be not good. On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 12:21 PM Chris Cappuccio <chris () nmedia net> wrote:
Mark Tinka [mark@tinka.africa] wrote:It is not terribly clever of Mikrotik to have two commands that dodifferentthings be that close in syntax.It should be a huge embarrasment to the designers. They survive on low price and unique features. It would be quite amazing to have a CLI without the nonsense.
Current thread:
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...?, (continued)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? borg (Aug 11)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Mark Tinka (Aug 11)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Nick Hilliard (Aug 11)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Mark Tinka (Aug 11)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Nick Hilliard (Aug 11)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Mark Tinka (Aug 11)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Nick Hilliard (Aug 11)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Mark Tinka (Aug 11)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? August Yang via NANOG (Aug 11)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Chris Cappuccio (Aug 14)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Tom Beecher (Aug 15)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Chris Cappuccio (Aug 15)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Tom Beecher (Aug 16)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Mike Hammett (Aug 15)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Chris Cappuccio (Aug 15)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Mike Hammett (Aug 15)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Chris Cappuccio (Aug 15)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Nick Hilliard (Aug 15)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Mark Tinka (Aug 15)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Rubens Kuhl (Aug 15)
- Re: Dodgy AS327933 ...? Jay Hennigan (Aug 11)