nanog mailing list archives
Re: NTP Sync Issue Across Tata (Europe)
From: goemon--- via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 01:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Mike Hammett wrote:" As such, the ultimate (a little expensive) solution is to have your own Rb clocks locally."Yeah, that's a reasonable course of action for most networks.For most data centers with time sensitive transactions, at least.*sigh*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_clock Modern rubidium standard tubes last more than ten years, and can cost as little as US$50. https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=rubidium
From this discussion it seems there is very little overlap between nanog
membership and time-nuts.Cheap Rb GPSDO are well known there. Even a bottom barrel OCXO GPSDO would provide significant protection against determined GPS attacker.
-Dan
Current thread:
- Re: NTP Sync Issue Across Tata (Europe), (continued)
- Re: NTP Sync Issue Across Tata (Europe) Mike Hammett (Aug 13)
- Re: NTP Sync Issue Across Tata (Europe) Masataka Ohta (Aug 14)
- Re: NTP Sync Issue Across Tata (Europe) Masataka Ohta (Aug 09)
- Re: NTP Sync Issue Across Tata (Europe) Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 13)
- Re: NTP Sync Issue Across Tata (Europe) Rubens Kuhl (Aug 05)
- Re: NTP Sync Issue Across Tata (Europe) Giovane C. M. Moura via NANOG (Aug 07)
- Re: NTP Sync Issue Across Tata (Europe) Mark Tinka (Aug 07)
- Re: NTP Sync Issue Across Tata (Europe) Giovane C. M. Moura via NANOG (Aug 07)
- Re: NTP Sync Issue Across Tata (Europe) Mark Tinka (Aug 07)
- Re: NTP Sync Issue Across Tata (Europe) Mel Beckman (Aug 06)
- Fwd: NTP Sync Issue Across Tata (Europe) Mel Beckman (Aug 06)
- Re: NTP Sync Issue Across Tata (Europe) goemon--- via NANOG (Aug 14)
- Re: NTP Sync Issue Across Tata (Europe) Forrest Christian (List Account) (Aug 14)
- Re: NTP Sync Issue Across Tata (Europe) Masataka Ohta (Aug 14)
- Re: NTP Sync Issue Across Tata (Europe) Forrest Christian (List Account) (Aug 14)