nanog mailing list archives
Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 10:07:02 +0300
On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 10:01, Bjørn Mork <bjorn () mork no> wrote:
Why would you do it differently than for dual-stack routers, except that you skip the step where you configure the ID as a loopback address?
Because you may not have an option, if you're IPv6 only, vendors (e.g. junos) may expect you to punch it manually. Of course most of us punch it manually as loopback0 IPv4 to have more control over outcome. Question is legitimate and represents change where previously used mechanisms do not apply, therefore OP is right to ask 'well what should I do now'. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Router ID on IPv6-Only Crist Clark (Sep 07)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Saku Ytti (Sep 07)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Bjørn Mork (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Saku Ytti (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Bjørn Mork (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Saku Ytti (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Saku Ytti (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Randy Bush (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Crist Clark (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Saku Ytti (Sep 09)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Jeff Tantsura (Sep 12)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Bjørn Mork (Sep 12)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Jeff Tantsura (Sep 13)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Bjørn Mork (Sep 13)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Sep 08)