nanog mailing list archives
Re: jon postel
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 14:18:41 -0700
my favorite is It's perfectly appropriate to be upset. I thought of it in a slightly different way--like a space that we were exploring and, in the early days, we figured out this consistent path through the space: IP, TCP, and so on. What's been happening over the last few years is that the IETF is filling the rest of the space with every alternative approach, not necessarily any better. Every possible alternative is now being written down. And it's not useful. -- Jon Postel
Current thread:
- jon postel Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Noah (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Dave Taht (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel bzs (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Nathan Angelacos (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Daniel Sterling (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Joseph (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Elmar K. Bins (Oct 17)
- Re: jon postel Grant Taylor via NANOG (Oct 17)
- Re: jon postel Carsten Bormann (Oct 17)
- Re: jon postel Grant Taylor via NANOG (Oct 17)
- Re: jon postel Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Noah (Oct 16)