nanog mailing list archives
Re: ipv4/25s and above
From: Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 17:12:32 -0300
I do not like mikrotik, but I need to say that RouterOS does support /31. All that you need to do, beyond set /31 at address for netmask, is check if the other address is defined at the network address. Em sáb., 19 de nov. de 2022 15:58, Denis Fondras <xxnog () ledeuns net> escreveu:
Le Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 01:39:59PM -0500, Bryan Fields a écrit :On 11/18/22 6:44 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:We could, but many of our DIA customers have all manner of CPE's that may or may not support this. Having unique designs per customer does not scale well.its almost 2023. /31 support is easily mandatory. You should make it mandatory.Mikrotik still doesn't support /31 addressing. I had a customer who was configuring their "router" the other day and we found this out. Has tomoveto a /30 on the link.You cannot configure a /31 on a Mikrotik yet you can play with /32 to overcome this limit.
Current thread:
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211211223.AYC, (continued)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211211223.AYC Tom Beecher (Nov 21)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211220729.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Nov 22)
- Fwd: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211220729.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Nov 22)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Matthew Petach (Nov 23)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211240353.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Nov 24)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Mark Tinka (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Dave Taht (Nov 27)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Bryan Fields (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Denis Fondras (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Douglas Fischer (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Bryan Fields (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Rubens Kuhl (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 18)
- ipv4/25s and above Sylvain Baya (Nov 19)