nanog mailing list archives
Re: ipv4/25s and above
From: Bryan Fields <Bryan () bryanfields net>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 13:39:59 -0500
On 11/18/22 6:44 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
We could, but many of our DIA customers have all manner of CPE's that may or may not support this. Having unique designs per customer does not scale well.its almost 2023. /31 support is easily mandatory. You should make it mandatory.
Mikrotik still doesn't support /31 addressing. I had a customer who was configuring their "router" the other day and we found this out. Has to move to a /30 on the link. He's in Africa, and I'm 100% certain Mikrotik is a go to customer router there. There's people peering on Mikrotik even! -- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 - Voice http://bryanfields.net
Current thread:
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211211223.AYC, (continued)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211211223.AYC Tom Beecher (Nov 21)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211211223.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Nov 21)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211211223.AYC Tom Beecher (Nov 21)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211220729.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Nov 22)
- Fwd: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211220729.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Nov 22)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Matthew Petach (Nov 23)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211240353.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Nov 24)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Mark Tinka (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Dave Taht (Nov 27)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Bryan Fields (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Denis Fondras (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Douglas Fischer (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Bryan Fields (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Rubens Kuhl (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 18)
- ipv4/25s and above Sylvain Baya (Nov 19)