nanog mailing list archives
Re: ipv4/25s and above
From: Sam Kretchmer <sam () coeosolutions com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 18:33:18 +0000
Dave, I work for a smaller ISP in the Midwest with clients coast-to-coast. I deliver internet to about 2/3 rds of them over private ethernet circuits, the rest I deliver private addressed SIP service. Aside a handful of them who advertise their own /24 to me over BGP, the rest are exclusively smaller than that. /29's and /30's are the most common, with a peppering of /28's and /27's. My total IP space is about a /19. Cheers! On 11/16/22, 8:41 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Dave Taht" <nanog-bounces+sam=coeosolutions.com () nanog org on behalf of dave.taht () gmail com> wrote: I am kind of curious as to the distribution of connections to smaller companies and other entities that need more than one ipv4 address, but don't run BGP. So, for as an ISP or infrastructure provider, what is the typical percentage nowadays of /32s /31s /30s... /25s of stuff that gets run "elsewhere"? Is there any correlation between the number of IPs a customer gets and the amount of bandwidth they buy? Obviously "retail", home use is /32s and there's an increasing amount of CGNAT, but I can't help but imagine there are thousands of folk running /27s and /29s for every /24 or /22 out there. I've been paying 15/month for a /29 for forever, but barely use it. -- This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-6981366665607352320-FXtz Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
Current thread:
- ipv4/25s and above Dave Taht (Nov 16)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Sam Kretchmer (Nov 16)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Mark Tinka (Nov 17)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Joe Maimon (Nov 17)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Mark Tinka (Nov 17)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Joe Maimon (Nov 18)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 18)
- Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Abraham Y. Chen (Nov 18)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Mark Tinka (Nov 19)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201009.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Nov 20)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201009.AYC Rubens Kuhl (Nov 20)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201503.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Nov 20)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Joe Maimon (Nov 17)