nanog mailing list archives
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 14:27:21 -0400
On Sat, Mar 26, 2022, 21:42 John Gilmore <gnu () toad com> wrote:
Today Google is documenting to its cloud customers that they should use 240/4 for internal networks. (Read draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-240 for the citation.) We have received inquiries from two other huge Internet companies, which are investigating or already using 240/4 as private IPv4 address space.
I think the advice in the draft, and on the quoted page of Google cloud docs is that you can use whatever address space you want for your voc network. I think it also says that choosing poorly could make portions if the internet unreachable. I don't see that the docs specify usage of 240/4 though.
Current thread:
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 202203261748.AYC, (continued)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 202203261748.AYC Fred Baker (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 202203261748.AYC Fred Baker (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Joe Greco (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Jay Hennigan (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported John Gilmore (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Brandon Butterworth (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Christopher Morrow (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported John Gilmore (Mar 28)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Joshua Mallad (Mar 28)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 28)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher (Mar 29)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported John Gilmore (Mar 30)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported John Kristoff (Mar 30)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 29)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 20220326125.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 20220326125.AYC Tom Beecher (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 20220326125.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 29)