nanog mailing list archives

Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine


From: Dennis Glatting <dg () pki2 com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 14:19:15 -0800

On Tue, 2022-03-01 at 15:18 -0500, Tom Beecher wrote:
Starlink however forgets that Russia does have anti satellite
weapons and they probably will not hesitate to use them which will
make low earth orbit a very dangerous place when Russia starts
blowing up the Starlink birds.    I applaud the humanitarian aspect
of providing Starlink service, unfortunately there are geopolitical
realities like access to space which is likely to be negatively
impacted if and when Russia starts shooting down these birds.   
Fortunately if they start shooting down the birds the debris will
burn up in a year or so unlike geosync orbit where it would stay
forever.



Russia is not going to be using up it's anti-sat weapons to take down
commercial internet birds. Let's use a little common sense here. 


+1

There are a lot of birds which translates to a number of weapons that
are likely an unnecessary expense at a time where the greatest expense
is focused on the ground.



On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 2:57 PM Scott McGrath <smcgrath () starry com>
wrote:
Starlink however forgets that Russia does have anti satellite
weapons and they probably will not hesitate to use them which will
make low earth orbit a very dangerous place when Russia starts
blowing up the Starlink birds.    I applaud the humanitarian aspect
of providing Starlink service, unfortunately there are geopolitical
realities like access to space which is likely to be negatively
impacted if and when Russia starts shooting down these birds.   
Fortunately if they start shooting down the birds the debris will
burn up in a year or so unlike geosync orbit where it would stay
forever.

On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 1:44 PM Phineas Walton <phin () phineas io>
wrote:
This is more of a brand image / marketing stunt for Starlink. A
pretty ingenious way to market which will heavily pay off long
term. To them, this is cheap for how much attention it’s getting
them.

Phin

On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 6:36 PM Crist Clark <cjc+nanog () pumpky net>
wrote:
So they’re going to offer the service to anyone in a denied area
for free somehow? How do you send someone a bill or how do they
pay it if you can’t do business in the country?

On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 4:39 PM Jay Hennigan <jay () west net>
wrote:
On 2/28/22 16:17, Michael Thomas wrote:

As a practical matter how does this help? You need to have
base 
stations/dishes, right? Can they be beefy ones that can pump
out 
gigabytes that would be capable of backfilling the load? Or
would it 
need to be multiple in parallel? Wouldn't that bandwidth be
constrained 
by the number of visible satellites in the constellation? I
wonder if 
they've ever even tested it with feeding into an internet
facing router. 
Could tables on the satellites explode?

If there aren't fixed Internet-connected earth stations line-
of-sight to 
the satellite that's serving the remote terminal, Starlink
will relay 
satellite-to-satellite until a path to an Internet-connected
earth 
station is in reach.

 From the linked article:

"Musk has previously stressed Starlink’s flexibility of
Starlink in 
providing internet service. In September, Musk talked about
how the 
company would use links between the satellites to create a
network that 
could provide service even in countries that prohibit SpaceX
from 
installing ground infrastructure for distribution.

As for government regulators who want to block Starlink from
using that 
capability, Musk had a simple answer.

“They can shake their fist at the sky,” Musk said."


-- 
Dennis Glatting
Numbers Skeptic

Current thread: