Re: What say you, nanog re: Starlink vs 5G?

[Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>]

On 6/24/22 9:09 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
> The term "5G" among technical circles started vague, became better defined over the course of several years, and is 
> becoming vague again. This nuance was never well understood in the public eye, nor by mass publications like CNN. This is a 
> battle for 12GHz, not 5G.

But is what Starlink saying true or not?

It would be a pity to not have an alternative to incumbent telephants.

Mike