nanog mailing list archives
Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 07:42:33 +0200
On 1/13/22 00:28, Colton Conor wrote:
I agree it seems like MPLS is still the gold standard, but ideally I would only want to have costly, MPLS devices on the edge, only where needed. The core and transport devices I would love to be able to use generic IPv6 enabled switches, that don't need to support LDP. Low end switches from premium vendors, like Juniper's EX2200 - EX3400 don't support LDP for example. MPLS switches are very expensive compared to enterprise switches.
I would be surprised to find devices that support SR, and not MPLS/LDP. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices, (continued)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Mark Tinka (Jan 11)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Saku Ytti (Jan 12)
- RE: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices aaron1 (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Saku Ytti (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Sander Steffann (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Dale W. Carder (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Randy Bush (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Sander Steffann (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Colton Conor (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Mark Tinka (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Saku Ytti (Jan 13)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Colton Conor (Jan 15)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices -> MPLS instead? Raymond Burkholder (Jan 15)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices -> MPLS instead? Mark Tinka (Jan 15)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices -> MPLS instead? scott (Jan 15)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Mark Tinka (Jan 15)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Jeff Tantsura (Jan 15)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Colton Conor (Jan 16)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Mark Tinka (Jan 16)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Brandon Butterworth (Jan 16)