nanog mailing list archives
Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties
From: sronan () ronan-online com
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 21:58:13 -0500
I believe that should be 19-72A1. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-19-72A1.pdf Essentially, all services must be transitioned to fiber or wireless by August 2nd, 2022. Shane
On Feb 16, 2022, at 9:27 PM, Brandon Svec via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote: I found an alarmist email from a provider that I have not fact checked that states- The FCC has issued Order 10-72A1 that mandates that all POTS Lines in the USA be replaced with an alternative service by August 2, 2022. Brandon SvecOn Feb 16, 2022, at 6:16 PM, Brandon Svec <bsvec () teamonesolutions com> wrote:Telcos have been trying/begging/warning of discontinuing copper for many years. Maybe the political and regulatory environment is currently allowing them to get on with it in some areas? I don’t think there is an FCC rule requiring the fiber as much as allowing the removal of copper. Brandon SvecOn Feb 16, 2022, at 6:01 PM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan () gmail com> wrote: NANOG'ers; At least in Boston, commercial property owners are receiving notices that 'copper lines are being removed per FCC rules' and replaced with fiber. The property owner, not the network operators (or users of unbundled elements if that's even still a thing) are being presented with an agreement that acknowledges the removal, authorizes the fiber installation and provides for a minor oversight of the design. It suggests that no costs are involved in terms of hosting equipment. No power reimbursement. No rent for spaces used. There is an ominous paragraph in the letter that says if the property owner doesn't comply that tenants will lose all services including elevator phones, alarms, voice, internet and any copper/ds0 originated services. They didn't say 911, but that would go without saying. Has anyone heard of this? What FCC rule requires this? Thanks for any insights. Warm regards, Martin
Current thread:
- LEC copper removal from commercial properties Martin Hannigan (Feb 16)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties L F (Feb 16)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties Martin Hannigan (Feb 16)
- Message not available
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties L F (Feb 16)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties Martin Hannigan (Feb 16)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties L F (Feb 16)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties Paul Emmons (Feb 16)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe (Feb 16)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties Brandon Svec via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties Brandon Svec via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties sronan (Feb 16)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties hak (Feb 16)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties Fletcher Kittredge (Feb 17)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties Martin Hannigan (Feb 17)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties Brandon Svec via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties Jay Hennigan (Feb 16)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties sronan (Feb 16)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties L F (Feb 16)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties Shrikumar.H (Feb 16)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Feb 17)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Feb 17)
- Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties Christopher Morrow (Feb 17)