nanog mailing list archives
Re: VPN recommendations?
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 10:54:39 -0800
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 10:18 AM Shawn L <shawnl () up net> wrote:
Meraki MX series? Dynamic IPs and NATs don't really cause them a problem. Some CGNats do (AT&T I'm looking at you).
Thanks Shawn, The documentation I found at https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Site-to-site_VPN/Site-to-Site_VPN_Settings suggests that the NAT firewall has to be explicitly configured to deliver UDP 500/4500 to the Meraki behind it. Are you aware of any documentation that describes: LAN - Meraki - NAT (dynaimic IP) - Internet - (static IP) Meraki - LAN Where the left-side Meraki is responsible for establishing and keeping the NAT translations alive without any special configuration on the NAT? Regards, Bill -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Re: VPN recommendations?, (continued)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Mike Hammett (Feb 11)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Valdis Klētnieks (Feb 10)
- RE: VPN recommendations? David Andrzejewski (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Dave Taht (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Mark Tinka (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Keith Stokes (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Shawn L via NANOG (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Mark Wiater (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Dave Taht (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Phineas Walton (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Shawn L via NANOG (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? William Herrin (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Tom Beecher (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Sabri Berisha (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Bjørn Mork (Feb 11)
- Re: VPN recommendations? William Herrin (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? William Herrin (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Mark Wiater (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Mel Beckman (Feb 10)