nanog mailing list archives
Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia
From: Tom Paseka via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 11:10:26 -0700
Paying for "peering", doesn't stop you being a tier-1. Being a Tier-1 means you are "transit free" (technical term, not commercial). No one is transiting your routes to other Tier-1 providers. On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 11:04 AM Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com> wrote:
Hi. Looking at the article on Tier 1 networks, I found one that I know for a fact that pays for some transit (12956) and some I usually don't associate to Tier 1 status, like 6762. Is there a list of such transit relationships by those bragging about being Tier 1 ? Rubens
Current thread:
- Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Rubens Kuhl (Aug 01)
- Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Tom Paseka via NANOG (Aug 01)
- Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Geoff Huston (Aug 01)
- Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Rubens Kuhl (Aug 01)
- Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Tom Beecher (Aug 02)
- Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Mike Hammett (Aug 02)
- Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Jared Mauch (Aug 02)
- Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Mike Hammett (Aug 02)
- Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Geoff Huston (Aug 01)
- Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Tom Paseka via NANOG (Aug 01)